Construction is among the most hazardous industries in the U.S., and Florida’s booming development sector means the stakes are high. Unfortunately, recent data show that worker deaths in Florida’s construction industry remain stubbornly high. This article examines the rising toll, root causes, regulatory gaps, and a case study of a fatality in Florida—plus policy recommendations to reduce further loss.
The Rising Toll: Florida Construction Fatalities in Context
Recent Data & Trends
- In 2023, Florida recorded 306 fatal work injuries across all industries. (Bureau of Labor Statistics)
- Of those, the construction sector accounted for 92 deaths, making it the industry with the highest number of fatalities in the state. (Bureau of Labor Statistics)
- Falls, slips, and trips caused 68 deaths statewide (22 % of total), with 43 of those falling within construction. (Bureau of Labor Statistics)
- In 2022, Florida had 307 work-related fatalities, and 91 in private construction. (Bureau of Labor Statistics)
- Historical numbers show fluctuation: for example, in 2018, Florida’s private construction industry had 101 fatalities, the highest among industries that year. (Bureau of Labor Statistics)
These figures highlight a persistent problem: Florida’s construction fatality numbers are among the highest in the state’s occupational death statistics year after year.
Causes & Areas of Concern
To understand why these tragedies persist, we need to examine the major risk factors and systemic weak points.
The Fatal Four & Other Leading Hazards
- Falls: By far the most frequent cause. In Florida’s 2023 data, falls/slips/trips caused 68 deaths statewide; 43 were in construction. (Bureau of Labor Statistics)
- Struck‑by incidents: Such as being hit by falling objects, cranes, or moving machinery. (Cardinal Law)
- Electrocutions: Contact with power lines, faulty wiring, live circuits.
- Caught-in/between: Workers trapped in collapsing structures, machinery, or between heavy materials.
These hazards are well-known, yet many incidents result from failure to adhere to safety protocols, inadequate training, or oversight lapses.
Secondary & Contributing Factors
- Scaffolding failures: Improper anchoring, defective parts, poor design, or user error. One infamous case involved a suspended scaffold cable failure resulting in a death in Ft. Lauderdale; OSHA cited the employer for inadequate attachments and lack of training. (EHS Today)
- Crane / lifting accidents: For example, in 2023, a Florida crane tipped and struck a worker in an aerial lift, due to inadequate ground support. OSHA cited the companies involved. (DOL)
- Structural collapse / formwork failure: In Orlando, two workers died when concrete support structures collapsed during a pour; OSHA cited contractors for failing to properly inspect formwork, shoring, and scaffolds. (EHS Today)
- Exposure to environmental stress: Heat, humidity, storms — Florida’s climate exacerbates risk, especially for outdoor workers.
- Inadequate safety culture, undertraining, lack of supervision: Many construction sites operate under intense schedule pressure, sometimes neglecting safety systems.
Specific Areas of Concern in Florida
- Rapid growth / small contractors: Many small contractors or subcontractors lack robust safety programs or full-time safety personnel.
- Seasonal extremes: Heavy rains, high winds, hurricanes, and hot/humid conditions may stress equipment, scaffolding, and worker endurance.
- De‑regulation of local protections: In 2024, Florida passed legislation banning municipalities from enacting heat or shade requirements for outdoor workers, limiting local options to protect against climate‑driven hazards. (The Guardian)
- Public-sector gaps: OSHA does not cover state, county, or municipal employees under its general jurisdiction—state and municipal workers in Florida are often exempt from federal OSHA oversight unless state law picks them up. (Orlando Weekly)
Regulatory & Legal Framework in Florida
Understanding Florida’s laws and how they interface with federal rules is key to seeing where gaps exist.
OSHA & Federal Standards
- The Occupational Safety and Health Act (1970) mandates that employers provide a workplace “free from recognized hazards.” OSHA promulgates safety standards (including 29 C.F.R. part 1926 for construction). (The Florida Bar)
- OSHA inspects workplaces, issues citations, and can levy fines. Violations are categorized (serious, willful, repeat) with escalating penalties. (Ask IFAS – Powered by EDIS)
- In Florida, OSHA’s construction safety rules apply to private employers. Because Florida lacks a state OSHA plan, the federal program operates directly. (The Florida Bar)
- OSHA’s general duty clause serves as a catchall for hazards not specifically regulated.
Florida’s Statutes & Safety Laws
- Chapter 442, Florida Statutes governs occupational safety and health in Florida. Section 442.20 authorizes the Division of Safety (within Florida’s labor department) to adopt rules, assist employers, and enforce safe working conditions. (Justia Law)
- Section 442.007 (in older versions) requires every employer to furnish safe employment, use safety devices and safeguards, adopt and use reasonably adequate methods, etc. (The Florida Senate)
- Workers’ Compensation (Chapter 440) offers limited immunity to employers from common-law suits, except in certain “intentional tort” scenarios. For example, under § 440.11, an employer may be liable for death/injury if conduct meets a high standard of intentionality. (Justia Law)
- Florida also protects workers who file compensation claims from retaliation. (Reddit)
- Local governments’ limitations: As of 2024, municipalities cannot enact laws requiring local heat or shade breaks for outdoor workers, even though heat stress is a real danger. (AP News)
Case Study: Pendergrass v. Michaels (Wall Collapse Death, Florida)
A particularly illustrative legal case in Florida is Pendergrass v. Michaels, Inc. (2006, Florida District Court of Appeal). (CaseLaw)
Facts
- During removal of scaffolding on a jobsite where four masonry walls (14 ft high) had been completed, strong winds struck.
- The walls were in the process of being braced, but the contractor had scheduled delivery of materials and a bracing crew later in the afternoon.
- Before bracing was completed, the north wall collapsed, killing a worker (Pendergrass), while others were still cleaning up. (CaseLaw)
- The contractor (Michaels) and masonry subcontractor (Oceanview) had earlier discussed the wind risk and agreed to brace, but did not do so in time. (CaseLaw)
Legal Findings
- OSHA cited Michaels for failing to establish a limited access zone prior to masonry work, and failing to brace masonry walls over 8 feet until permanent supports were in place. (CaseLaw)
- OSHA cited Oceanview for failing to maintain a safety program, failing to instruct employees in hazard recognition, and failing to brace walls appropriately. (CaseLaw)
- On appeal, the case addressed Florida’s workers’ compensation immunity under § 440.11. The court recognized an “intentional tort exception” could apply if the employer’s conduct meets the high threshold of being virtually certain to cause harm. (CaseLaw)
- The court found that the “intentional tort exception” required such circumstances as a history of prior, similar accidents or the employer’s intentional concealment of the danger, neither of which was met in this case. The court ultimately dismissed the claims against the employer (CaseLaw).
Relevance & Lessons
- This case shows how legal liability can overlap with OSHA enforcement, but at the same time, OSHA violations do not overcome the powerful workers’ compensation immunity afforded by statute in Florida.
- The workers’ compensation immunity defense comes with the “intentional tort exception”, but the legal standard for raising the exception is difficult to meet.
- The case underscores the importance of timely bracing, hazard recognition, and proactive safety planning, especially under changed conditions like wind or weather.
Safety Policies & Best Practices That Can Save Lives
To reduce fatalities in Florida’s construction industry, companies must adopt robust safety systems that go beyond mere compliance. Below are policy proposals and best practices:
- Strong Safety Management Systems (SMS)
- Implement a written safety and health program covering hazard assessment, training, incident reporting, inspections, and corrective action tracking.
- Identify a competent person (as required by OSHA) who can recognize hazards and intervene.
- Conduct daily toolbox talks and pre-shift hazard reviews, especially when weather or site conditions change.
- Empower all employees to stop work when they detect imminent danger.
- Fall Protection & Scaffolding Safety
- Develop scaffold plans, inspect scaffolds daily (or more often), and certify scaffolders.
- Use guardrails, toe boards, fall arrest systems, nets, and harnesses as appropriate.
- Ensure scaffold anchorage is properly designed; avoid makeshift or ad-hoc bracing.
- Provide training on scaffold erection, use, and dismantling procedures per OSHA 1926 Subpart L.
- For masonry walls above 8 feet, require rigid bracing until permanent structural support is in place (as in Pendergrass).
- Equipment, Crane & Lift Safety
- Require ground condition assessments before crane setup, ensure outriggers and supports are stable (learned from the 2023 crane/boom tipping death in Florida). (DOL)
- Use load charts appropriately, avoid lifting loads in swing zones over personnel, and prohibit walking under suspended loads.
- Document inspection records, maintenance logs, and safe-use certifications.
- Use signals, spotters, and exclusion zones around lifting operations.
- Monitoring & Mitigation of Environmental Hazards
- Provide shade, rest breaks, and hydration especially in Florida’s heat.
- Monitor weather forecasts (wind, storms) and pause work under extreme conditions.
- Use cooling vests, shade canopies, and rotate tasks to reduce heat stress.
- Even though local heat‑protection ordinances are now banned, employers should voluntarily adopt them; regulatory repeal doesn’t remove moral responsibility. (AP News)
- Training, Accountability, and Culture
- Require frequent refresher training on hazard recognition, safe procedures, and emergency response.
- Conduct both leading (near-miss, hazard audits) and lagging (incident, injury) metrics to monitor safety performance.
- Incentivize safety (not just productivity)—reward safe behavior, penalize unsafe shortcuts.
- Maintain open reporting systems, including anonymous hazard reporting, no retaliation.
- Audits, Third-party Reviews, and Benchmarking
- Use external audits or safety consultants periodically.
- Benchmark safety performance against industry peers (e.g., via ABC’s Safety Performance Evaluation Program [STEP]).
- Incorporate lessons from OSHA citations, legal cases, and near-misses into continuous improvement.
Key Gaps & Challenges
- Enforcement resource constraints: OSHA has limited staffing and may not inspect all high-risk sites.
- Lack of state OSHA plan: Florida’s reliance on federal OSHA means local nuance is harder to integrate.
- Statutory immunities & litigation hurdles: Workers’ compensation immunity limits employee claims unless high thresholds are met (intentional tort exception).
- Weak local authority over heat protections: The 2024 law prohibiting local heat/safety ordinances removes one tool for worker protection. (The Guardian)
- Public-sector exclusion: Public-employee construction work (e.g. municipal road crews) may not be covered fully by OSHA. (Orlando Weekly)
- Small contractors & subcontractors: These often lack safety staff, training budgets, or safety culture.
Policy & Regulatory Recommendations
- Adopt a Florida State OSHA Plan: This could allow tailored standards and enforcement focused on Florida’s unique climate hazards.
- Restore local authority over heat protections: Municipalities should be allowed to adopt shade, water breaks, rest requirements for outdoor workers.
- Increased funding for OSHA & state inspections: Target high-risk sites, rotating inspections, and whistleblower protections.
- Mandatory reporting of near-misses & hazard data: This encourages proactive safety and gives regulators more insight.
- Stricter penalties & incentives: Elevate consequences for willful violations, but also provide incentives (e.g., tax credits) for contractors with stellar safety records.
- Support safety training grants: Particularly for small subcontractors and minority contractors.
- Public transparency dashboards: Make OSHA citations, fatalities, and enforcement data publicly accessible by county, contractor, and site.
Florida’s construction death toll is not just a statistic — it represents individual tragedies, lost families, and avoidable harm. While the data show decades of persistent danger, they also underscore that many of the root causes (falls, scaffolding failures, crane mishaps) are well known, and effective safety systems exist. Even if Florida’s public policy leans toward reliance on worker’s compensation and against heavy regulation of construction activities, the human consequences of allowing preventable deaths urge that contractors themselves should voluntarily adopt stricter safety measures and foster safe environments for their valuable workers.
John Caravella, Esq
John Caravella Esq., is a construction attorney and formerly practicing project architect at The Law Office of John Caravella, P.C., representing architects, engineers, contractors, subcontractors, and owners in all phases of contract preparation, litigation, and arbitration across New York and Florida. He also serves as an arbitrator to the American Arbitration Association Construction Industry Panel. Mr. Caravella can be reached by email: [email protected] or (631) 608-1346.
The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only. Readers of this website should contact their attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information on this site without first seeking legal advice from counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website authors, contributors, contributing law firms, or committee members and their respective employers.